Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
CommentFebruary 29 2016

Why banks have to think backwards on fintech

Techfin or fintech? Incumbent banks think in terms of the former – applying technology to the financial process – while for start-ups it's the latter, in that they take the financial process and apply technology. It is a subtle difference, but an important one, says Chris Skinner.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Why banks have to think backwards on fintech

When I talk to bankers and start-up executives, it is clear that there are differing views of the world. The difference is not as clear-cut as nimble innovator versus dinosaur incumbent, which is how many portray it, but it exists nonetheless. In fact, it is a radical difference in thinking, perhaps best summed up by one banker who said to me recently: “Surely this is techfin rather than fintech?”

I thought about what he meant and realised that this is the subtle difference between the innovator and the incumbent. An innovator thinks of financial innovation as fintech: taking financial processes and applying technology. Incumbents think of this as techfin: taking technology to work with financial processes. This difference in thinking, although subtle, does create a very different thought process and output in terms of the way in which technology is used, and so I thought I would delve a little deeper, as this is key to seeing how the world differs between the eyes of innovators and incumbents.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial