Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

Unclear definitions are hindering bank financing of nature-positive solutions

While banks’ interest in nature finance ‘surges’, uncertainty over its meaning leaves a $700bn investment gap
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Unclear definitions are hindering bank financing of nature-positive solutions© Getty Images

Uncertainty around what is meant by “nature-positive finance” is stalling banks’ efforts to work on solutions that could halt or reverse nature loss, according to lenders and international organisations.

Banks say the lack of clarity and consensus exposes them to greenwashing risks, and is preventing them from being more ambitious in this area. “What we’re trying to achieve is nature-positive economies, but we’ve only got till 2030 to get this right and we’re still battling with standardised market definitions,” says Oliver Withers, head of nature at Standard Chartered. “You then get into the world of greenwashing. I’d be nervous about [saying anything] is nature-positive because we just don’t know what the definition is yet.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial